COD 4 on PS3

HotStuff

Member
I got a PS3 a couple of weeks ago and was pretty disappointed to see that you can only have a maximum of 6v6 players on a map at a time. Also you can't play hard core in domination mode. Also you can't pick sides...the list goes on.

It's basically COD 4 for children!

Is this the nature of online gaming for the PS3 ?
 

Traxata

Junior Administrator
We use ours as a glorified Blue-Ray player. my brother plays the odd game on it, and then PS3 Buzz, which you don't have to buy like 6 different versions of (like the PS2) as it is always updating online.
 

thatbloke

Junior Administrator
Is this the nature of online gaming for the PS3 ?

Yes.

All online console games are massively simplified - they all* (*most of them) tend to use a matchmaking system of some description to just place you into a random match.

Though you can normally group up with some friends and then tell the matchmaking system that you want to play together, that's about the limit of it.

Also in the console version you need to get to a particular rank before you can unlock all game modes I believe....

That, and a friend of mine was playing, and having issues, told him to give me the pad and afer 30 seconds to learn the controls -I- was owning the server. So that's a bit about the standard of alot of the players too :)
 

HotStuff

Member
Warhawk allows upto 32 players but is 3rd person....grrrr

Resistance 2 allows 60 players and is sci-fi FPS (good call PSIsoilder). WHY THE HELL HAS INFINITY WARD ONLY ALLOWED 12 WITH COD 4?!!!!

I tried "bad company", and found that an improvement over COD 4. Allows 24 players, twice the amount of COD4 and has 8 conquest maps. Yes, the maps are bigger on BC...but certainly it feels more like a battle with 12 on a team, rather than a pathetic 'squad' like encounter with 6 per team.

BC is clearly a spin off of the very successful battlefield series - only not released on PC. Can't really say it brings anything new to the series but it looks like it's the only decent worth playing realistic FPS warfare game for the PS3.
 
E

elDiablo

Guest
...tend to use a matchmaking system of some description to just place you into a random match.

Though you can normally group up with some friends and then tell the matchmaking system that you want to play together, that's about the limit of it.

...

That, and a friend of mine was playing, and having issues, told him to give me the pad and afer 30 seconds to learn the controls -I- was owning the server. So that's a bit about the standard of alot of the players too :)

The "consoles" use matchmaking services to simplify the game finding and joining. Microsoft (and I'm guessing Sony, though I haven't done any work with them yet) want to move away from the idea of "servers" and "clients" in the multiplayer games. Even though (in Halo 3, for example) one person is (sometimes) physically "hosting" the game, to the user, it is treated as a "lobby", where people get together and start a game. You can invite, leave and kick people from the lobby. You're not kicking "clients" from the "server".

They do this in order to make multiplayer matches seem to start faster. It's easier than having a long list of servers that you scroll through to find one that you like the look of (a la BF2 and all the settings - no vehicles, spawn time, etc.). And I can tell you that the match making services don't randomly dump you into any old game. They are doing what it says on the tin; match making. The game tries to match you up with people similar to your ability, as is shown by thatbloke joining a server, and owning it 30 seconds later.

Now, it is obviously up to the game how to tell the match making service how to rate people (and therefore, who should play who), which is very hard, and sometimes breaks. Which is what I'm guessing is happening with you, HotStuff.

Still, just some random thoughts.
 

waterproofbob

Junior Administrator
I personally think 6v6 works in CoD brilliantly both in 4 and 5 I find it more enjoyable with that many ppl so not all that bothered on that front.

Took me a while to get used to CoD5 style of playing but I like 6v6 CoD it is more team based and 1v1 1v2 than the insane spam that more than that can be.
 

PsiSoldier

Well-Known Member
I personally think 6v6 works in CoD brilliantly both in 4 and 5 I find it more enjoyable with that many ppl so not all that bothered on that front.

This.

But that might be due to the fact it's impossible to rush and silently knife people in 16v16 matches ;D
 
Top