Diablo 3..

[Silk]

...looks like it'll rock.

http://www.gamesradar.com/pc/diablo.../a-20080630144129500053/g-2008063084756359080

*grins*

 

[Nanor]

Looks very Titan Quest-esque. I'll pick it up regardless, but Titan Quest didn't impress me.

 

[thatbloke]

Titan Quest looked alot like Diablo II. I'll pick it up regardless, but Titan Quest didn't impress me.

Fixed.

 

[Nanor]

I have no penis.

Fixed!


If Diablo looks like Titan Quest, then Titan Quest looks like Diablo so my point stands.

 

[DocBot]

If Diablo looks like Titan Quest, then Titan Quest looks like Diablo so my point stands.

I see you conveniently left the sequel number out of your argument... B+ for effort, C- for the actual argument.

 

[Klown]

I think it's kinda low of blizzard to go and make a diablo 3.. even tho it looks kinda fun.. oh, and anyone else thinks the witch doctor is just a mix of existing classes? I mean, confuse curse, summon undead stuffs, corpse explosion only on your own minions, a zombie wall (it may be made of zombies, but it's still another one of them walls), horrify - barbs grim totem does the same, the fireball reminds a litte of the meteor, doesnt it? with a long cast time or w/e and lots of aoe dmg. locust swarm? poison nova? poison javelin?.. smells like lack of imagination imo.. aye, I might be a bit harsh on the game, but it made me really angry when blizzard does the followup to a game they didnt really make in the first place, and flagship (blizzard north) is stuck with different name and story for their game