Hitman: Blood Money (My review)

Nanor

Well-Known Member
Ok, so I've had Blood Money for about.. 2 weeks now. I'm very impressed if I do say so. This combines stealth, deception and skill like never before. Heck, there's even some budgeting!

Overview:

Ok, I've installed it and I've started it up. I ofcourse, with all games I play, something always goes wrong. I can immediatley tell that my computer can't actually handle it as my mouse chops up. I can live with that, even if it will dull the gaming experience somewhat. I start the first level, a tutorial. This basically involves our hero infiltrating an abandoned fun fair whilst teaching you how the game works. So I learn to walk, climb and smash someones face against a rail in 5 minutes!

I work my way through the level whilst enjoying the gaming experience I'm having. Then I meet my first problem, I'm given a sniper rifle and told to shoot a few guards. Ofcourse, once I zoom in, taking shots is litterally impossible, so I have to do without zooming in and just use the standard crosshair on my screen. Bleh, I say!

The game is, despite it's choppiness on my computer, a work of gaming genious. It's a game you can, and perhaps want to work out a plan on how you're going to pulverise a clown and work your way into a mob bosses house or how you're going to push someone off the side of a building to make it look like an 'accident'. Ofcourse, it's not quite as speedy as that, it involves planning and executing. You're going to have to find out whatever ways possible to take down targets to actually get to the target. Whether this involves poisoning someones coffee, or planting a bomb on a chandelier and dropping it at the exact time. Ofcourse, you don't have to do that, you could always wait until they're alone and fibre wire them. :)

I find there are several ways of taking out enemies if it starts a chain reaction:

1) This would be, sneaking around and pummelling them and disposing of the body once it's taken out.

2) Ofcourse, the above might not work. They could catch you when you're about to fibre wire them and go to run and get a card, at which point you take out your silenced silverballers and pummel them on the head.

3) Then that might not work, they might get the guard and he's gonna take out his gun and get reinforcements, and before you know it, there will be about 3 guards there. At that point you rip out your SMG. It's silenced, and it still does considerable damage, not to mention the fire rate! If you manage to take them out, sure you've got some cleaning to do, but at least you're not dead.

4) So lets say, the above doesn't work (You never had what it takes to do it silently, eh?) and lo and behold, there are half a dozen of armed guards standing in front of you. You have 2 options. Take out your M4/Shotgun and blast your way, no matter how many people see you, or alternativley you can run and hide in a closet, which has it's novelty values when you can look out and see them looking for you, then you decide the time to come out, silently kill the guards and start at step one.

Pros:
It's food for thought. It's nothing like BF2, where you shoot first ask questions later. You think of a plan, no matter how complex, and if you mess up, you face the consequences..

It has upgrades, you're not stuck with the same plain old pistol. When the game progresses, you're given more choices. Ofcourse, that can sound a bit drab, so they give you choices. You can sacrifice you're silencers for added damage and accuracy if you plan for a noisy entrance.

Notoriety. Are you infamous in the eyes of the law? If you've taken our your M4 and blasted your way through 50 people, people are going to be supicious in your next mission, rather than being dumb and thinking 'what can go wrong?'. You're notoriety is graded from 0-100. If you have a high notoriety, people won't let you into certain places, making life somewhat harder for 47. To get rid of your notoriety you can simply bribe citizens, police chief or even get a new identity!

Cons:

If you have a slow computer, you're in trouble. There's nothing worse than getting in trouble and taking out your guns and attempting to aim whilst juttering around like you're having withdrawal symptoms (Caffeine related ones ;) ), or when you go to take a human shield so you don't take all the bullets and spending 30 seconds trying to get in the right place so you can actually do it, by which time ofcourse you're dead.

The story is pretty bad. It's not terrible, but you could hardly make it into even a BBC 2 lunchtime film. Without giving away too much, some person is looking for him and invites some reporter round. He shows him a file telling what happened and then that's where your mission originates from. So you basically know what happens. That somewhat subtracts from the story.

Overall:

One hell of a game, though I'd recommend you buy it only if you have a pretty good computer. The game combines everything you could want in a game, no matter what mood you're in. It tests your finesse and skill, as well as your planning and execution.


Hope you enjoyed my very first review! :)
 
P

Phryxus

Guest
Good comments Nanor, but I hate to say that I beat you to reviewing it! :)

Not sure if i agree with your analysis on the story, as I thought the whole premise (won't spoil it for those that haven't played it - don't know the elaborate spoiler bar stuff everyone does) was rather good and really influenced the later levels, 'A Dance with the Devil' especially. Although I do agree that right at the beginning, as you say, it is all told in flashback and takes a while to get going.

As for performance, I'd be interested to know your PC specs because on my 2.6ghz, ATI Radeon 9700 powered machine with 512mb of RAM (by no means a killer rig) it ran as smooth as silk on all but the first level 'The Death of a Showman' and 'You Better Watch Out', where the weather effects killed the performance in outdoor areas.

If anyone was looking for more detail on Hitman features however, this is just the ticket. Another thing i've been thinking about though, that I posted in Ronin's review of RE4, is now that interest in writing reviews has increased we could have some sort of list of games people want feedback on? It would help as a spark for more game information and would also prevent everyone reviewing the same game - although in some cases if details are missed (like I did in mine) multiple reviews could help too.
 

Tetsuo_Shima

In Cryo Sleep
Hmmmmm. I played the demo on my X360 and to be honest, I wasnt all that impressed. I played Hitman 2: Silent Assassin on the PS2, which I believe to be the epitany of the series, and in comparison it somehow just doesnt feel so Hitman-ish. Im not exactly sure what it is, but it just doesnt make me feel comfy. The gory deaths are there, plus all that cavorting around with silenced weapons that I enjoyed a lot; but there's definitely something missing. Maybe its just the demo version :/
 

BiG D

Administrator
Staff member
I couldn't disagree more. Hitman 2 wasn't that great... even Contracts was better, and it was just rehashes of the previous games. But if you're playing it as a shooter, you're missing the best parts.
 

Tetsuo_Shima

In Cryo Sleep
Odd. I loved Hitman 2, the Mafia mansion infiltration was fun, and sp were the assassination missions in the middle east. I guess it just depends on what you played first and what you were expecting. When I played Blood Money for the first time, the (small) thing which twigged to me as a dodgy showcase for next-gen games was the little blindfolded guy tied to a chair or something just inside the carnival. His voice kept repeating... and repeating ... and repeating. It annoyed me :/ Things like that make me think 'How could the developers not have sorted that? If that's the kind of thing they leave, what's the rest of the game going to be like? No thanks.'
 
P

Phryxus

Guest
Testsuo, you really need to give the game a bit more of a chance to see what it can really do. If you want to know a little more about the later missions (that actually show off the parts of Hitman you like) then ask me, Nanor or Piacular as i'm pretty sure we've all completed the game (not too sure if Nanor has though).

The level you played is the uber-scripted, super linear training mission that really, really sucks. It seemed obvious to me that it was just a nice way of getting a first introductory level in without it being too obvious that you were learning how to play the game (by that I mean instead of creating a separate 'training instance it dresses it up as a hit). You're led by the hand all the way through and forced to kill people - something that never happens in the later levels (apart from your targets of course). In the review I did (which I stupidly named Game Reviews/Comments so no-one knew what it was on about) there were a few questions asked where I said pretty much the same thing and mentioned some changes I'm sure you'd like as a Hitman 2 veteran. The disguises work properly now - no staying away from the x-ray vision guards this time and the crowd scenes that it can render are quite impressive. Some models do repeat, so the variety in character models isn't extensive - but to be honest, it's only 47 that you really need to pay attention to anyway. I personally think that you'd be missing out on the best Hitman game in the series if you don't give it a real chance.

Link here, I think Twisto asked your very same question.
 

Tetsuo_Shima

In Cryo Sleep
Well, I might actually be in with a chance of taking this on because my brother has gone and expressed to me an interest in the game. I'll reserve full judgement on the game then until I get a wee tussle with it first.
 
Top