[Tech] Lock up your daughters ... oh and your warez!

Haven

Administrator
Staff member
Yeah US extradition to "Gitmo" for your love of all things Lilly Allen does seem a little harsh. Still I wont tell anyone about your Robbie Williams collection if you don't ...
 

VibroAxe

Junior Administrator
o_O

But yeah, how are they planning on tracking this once every turns on the SSL connection in their bit torrent client
 

Wol

In Cryo Sleep
...in they are bit torrent client

me know not english.

*headdesk*

I've actually just started buying stuff instead off amazon *-)

Maybe if lily allens music wasnt so fricking shit, then I'd buy that......
 

DeZmond

Junior Administrator
Indeed, another example of our local friendly government throwing away more freedoms. The slashdot article and links were pretty convincing that it's not a great idea tbh.
 

SwampFae

Super Moderator
Staff member
Issue: People up'ing encryption levels and thus becoming harder to track.(Yes this is what will happen. It has happened before, so why not again, eh)

Police, MI5 -and- MI6 are trying to tell them to stop with this BS.
And with good reason.
imho the government should listen tbh.
 

Wol

In Cryo Sleep
Digital Economy Bill

Don't think I've seen an actual thread on here properly about this, so am wondering what peoples' opinions are on the whole Digital Economy Bill coming in.

At what point is the web going to start moving across to using secure connections everywhere!
 

Haven

Administrator
Staff member
Re: Digital Economy Bill

Not an obvious title but I did bring this up here :)

Carry on the conversation in here or there ...
 

Wol

In Cryo Sleep
Re: Digital Economy Bill

Ah. in which case, feel free to delete this topic / merge it!
I searched for "digital economy bill" and got no results ..... :D

mmmm. mergalicious - ta :)

[mod]gief cookies. Haven[/mod]
 

Taffy

New Member
The main thrust of this bill, from what I can gather given my limited time to read it at the moment, is to stop people visiting sites deemed 'unsuitable'. Without even going into the many many dangers of one person in Government being able to choose what is 'unsuitable' and thus censor it from the entire population, the fact of the matter is it simply won't work. People who want to visit such sites WILL find a way to do so. Terrorists, peadophiles and the like are not generally stupid people. Given the publicity of this bill, coupled with the amount of time it would take to hunt down and block all these websites, those groups will have plenty of time to work around it. Rendering the whole bill useless in every aspect and achieving nothing more than reducing our freedom just a little more. Oh, and no doubt costing us a ton of money for some inexplicable reason.

imho the government should listen tbh.

Not likely. I'm just hoping that the Tories can get their act together and win an outright majority in the election. Not so much because I'm a right-wing Tory boy (although I am :D), but because this current lot couldn't tell their arse from their elbow!
 

Gizmo-5

In Cryo Sleep
but because this current lot couldn't tell their arse from their elbow, WITH BOTH HANDS!

fixed

Edit: the police bit worries me, since we've foiled several terrorist attacks since the july incident through surveillance and the chaps at MI5.
 

Ki!ler-Mk1

Active Member
I'd like to know if we'll be able to know if we're being censored [mod]highly secret section removed for public safety ... and you're just not allowed to do that to badgers! Haven[/mod], because its annoying that they allegedly censor by giving us the "page does not exist error", i would prefer a "Even tho you may or may not be an adult incontrol of your own life, it has been deemed that this web site is unsuitable for you to view" message. And putting all porn on perhaps a wwwp. system* would make the internet instantly safe for all!

*I havent a fucking clue :D
 

thatbloke

Junior Administrator
I'd like to know if we'll be able to know if we're being censored, because its annoying that they allegedly censor by giving us the "page does not exist error", i would prefer a "Even tho you may or may not be an adult incontrol of your own life, it has been deemed that this web site is unsuitable for you to view" message. And putting all porn on perhaps a wwwp. system* would make the internet instantly safe for all!

*I havent a fucking clue :D

but... mai pr0ns....

you do raise a very good point though - being told that you are being prevented from seeing something due to the government's censorship would be good.

It will then mean that we can contact the ISP and tell them to stop being douches.
 
Top