Medal of Honor: Modern Warfare

Nanor

Well-Known Member
Who's on a bandwagon?

Also, trailer!

Don't like the look of the engine for some reason but it looks like it'll be a decent romp.
 

Dragon

Well-Known Member
Seriously, from the trailer it just looks like another Rambo rip off with the oh so invincible action hero and shooting action. Not my type of game.
 

Ghostwolf67

Well-Known Member
Let the one up games begin. Its time for who can make the most overthetop and unrealistic modern warfare game. We've had a great few heats in the competition so far starting with WWII featuring prominently and it was a close run thing on the 'Most demonic nazi', 'Most patriotic spiel' and the 'who can make the allied guns the shittest so much so you wonder how we won in the first place' trophies. CoD:MW2 has set the bar very high but i'm assured by previews that medal of honour:MW has the settings to out do even that. We wait with expectation as they get ready to announce the winners for 'Most arab nations invaded.', 'Most bullshit technological weapon that actually works effectively.', and of course that most coveted of trophies 'Least Realism.'
 

Ronin Storm

Administrator
Staff member
Realism is overrated.

It's a choice, I think. A bit like the difference between a film where they get their all-so-serious radio chatter wrong in ways that people who knew what they were doing wouldn't (e.g. "Over and out" is meaningless). If you care about that sort of thing then making mistakes with it is a bit irritating. If you don't then you just gloss straight past it or miss it entirely.

Thus guns that take half a magazine to drop a terrorist feel wrong to people who like realism, where guns that leave you gimped after a glancing blow are irritating to people who don't.
 

Ghostwolf67

Well-Known Member
I know its just a game. Its a game genre i like and its a game genre that i can see becoming exaclty like the WWII one before it. As far removed from the truth or reality as possible.

My problem isnt that its a game. Because why would I complain about that? If i wanted the same experience in different media i'd watch ross kemp in afganistan. Or TBH with how the stories are tending lately read a tom clancy novel. My problem is that MW2 had such a crazy over the top game plot that how exactly are modern ripoff... i mean modern warfare competitors going to top it? We saw what CoD 5 was like in the latest line of the same game again and again and again and again. and again. They had to introduce zombie add ons into that POS to try and pump some life into it (or pump more money out of it, whichever comes first). The only way is to either be more realistic (yeah right) or to be more crazy and over the top (guess which one they'll choose).
 

Panda with issues...

Well-Known Member
Realism is overrated. They're videogames for christs sake.
Arcade shooters are overrated. They're a dime a dozen.

Clue is in the title: They're billing the games as 'modern warfare' when what they're actually producing is a game that allows people to dual wield shotguns, submachineguns and survive hails of bullets, with cover being an optional extra. The fact that the story has been used multiple times before, most noticibly and recently by WiC just shows that they're lazy. Any pretence to 'modern warfare' went out the door as soon as the CGed russian boots hit rendered American soil. At least stuff like Red Dawn and WiC was set during the cold war when this was a plausible (if unlikely) scenario.

It's not like the world doesn't have dozens of actual conflict hotspots that could be utilised.

Obviously MoH MW isn't out yet, but I expect it to continue in the vein of the previous games where a ridiculously hard one man army kicks wave after wave of enemy ass.

Notice how I didn't bash Halo for being unrealistic, I only bashed it for being shit.
 

BiG D

Administrator
Staff member
It's not like the world doesn't have dozens of actual conflict hotspots that could be utilised.
Yes, that totally works every time someone tries it. :rolleyes:

I understand that people enjoy "realistic" games. I'm not saying games can't be realistic. But as you guys keep pointing out, the MoH series has always valued a cinematic experience over realism. Why the hell are you whining about it when you could ignore it and go play a game that caters to what you're looking for instead?
 

Panda with issues...

Well-Known Member
That link is exactly why one of the bigger companies is needed to push one through.

Why are you debating this with us then rather than playing your balls to the wall mislabled action games then?
 

BiG D

Administrator
Staff member
Konami was signed on to the project. They backed out shortly after the game was announced because the public outcry was simply too much. No one wants to touch current conflicts with a 20 foot pole.

Mislabled? Forgive me, but was the game renamed to contain some form of the word "realistic" when I wasn't looking?
 
Top