Spicypixel
New Member
Just to wade in in the Nvidia/ATI debate. Having used an 8800GTS through the Vista 32bit era I could have strangled any and all driver teams. It was atrocious - NVIDIA DRIVER HAS STOPPED WORKING etc.
In terms of CPU neither brand really has any strengths. When looking at the Bad Company 2 benches the difference between any of the CPUs from either camp over 3ghz was within the margin for error. I'd argue that most games are still GPU bound and if you can clock any CPU to 4ghz you're laughing.
So by that notion you'll probably get a more balanced system following the AMD/ATI route simply due to saving money on the CPU/mobo combo and being able to spend more on a GPU/RAM.
The lower end SB 2500k is also fine with a upper mid range nvidia card, such as the GTX 570 - assuming budget allows.
An option off hand: (couldn't find a pre built sandy bridge system under 700 with a gpu of value in)
OcUK Add a 6950
In terms of CPU neither brand really has any strengths. When looking at the Bad Company 2 benches the difference between any of the CPUs from either camp over 3ghz was within the margin for error. I'd argue that most games are still GPU bound and if you can clock any CPU to 4ghz you're laughing.
So by that notion you'll probably get a more balanced system following the AMD/ATI route simply due to saving money on the CPU/mobo combo and being able to spend more on a GPU/RAM.
The lower end SB 2500k is also fine with a upper mid range nvidia card, such as the GTX 570 - assuming budget allows.
An option off hand: (couldn't find a pre built sandy bridge system under 700 with a gpu of value in)
OcUK Add a 6950