Why do we have to go through this pain all over again?
Because some people are livin' in a box.
Box >>>>> hall!
Go go box!
If we were still short a couple of people closer to the lan, wonder if it would be worth asking if we can just have the box without filling it? If they haven't booked them all out they might do it?
So its currently 17v3....(everyone v Noes) ... the noes cant win.
>implying a clanbox minus 3 people can be booked.
The "Yes -- but only if" answer (in what I was trying to aim for in wording it) would mean the same thing as "NO -- but I'll go in a box if that's what the vast majority want."Same as Vel. I won't be one of 2 or 3 people who scuppers a box by not paying, but at the same time I'd rather not be in a box. THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.
EDIT: Just to be super super clear on this; if we have some tally system like last time, where people's votes are collected into merely 'yes' and 'no' - I'd like my vote to count in the no pile.
Last time the 'maybe' votes were counted as 'yes'es; I can most definitely confirm I'm far more on the 'no' side of the spectrum.
The "Yes -- but only if" answer (in what I was trying to aim for in wording it) would mean the same thing as "NO -- but I'll go in a box if that's what the vast majority want."
Only direct Yes will be counted as a yes, that middle option is purely for "I'll do it if everyone else is going to". Think alternative vote,